|
|
|
The main direction of Susquehannock
activity was up and down the Susquehanna River. At the river's
headwaters were the Iroquois Five Nations who were flanked to the north
and west by the Hurons, to the north by the French of Canada, and to the
east by the Dutch of Rensselaerswyck and Fort Orange (Albany) on the
Hudson. Surrounding the Chesapeake Bay, into which the Susquehanna
falls, were the English of Maryland and more distant Virginia. The more
important Indian peoples of the upper end of the bay included the Piscatawas of the Potomac valley, the Susquehannock's themselves on
their river, and the Nanticokes of the bay's eastern shore. In the Delaware
valley, east of the Susquehanna and parallel with it, were the Lenape,
the "grandfathers" of all the eastern Algonquian peoples. Here, again,
the Dutch were nearby: after conquering the Swedish settlers on the
Delaware in 1655, the Dutch planted their colony of New Amstel (New
Castle) only twenty miles away from the head of Chesapeake Bay. Today an
intercoastal waterways canal carries shipping across the narrow neck of
land that separates the two bays. Indians and colonists traversed the
isthmus by canoe, with a choice of several creeks and portages. They
might paddle from the Chesapeake up the Elk River and its tributaries,
portaging short distances to the headwaters of Appoquinimink or St.
George's creeks, down which they could float in ease to the Delaware.9
Unlike many other Indians whose trade was monopolized by one or another
colony, the Susquehannock's were able to travel in different directions
to different markets. There were the Swedes and Dutch on Delaware Bay,
and the English of Virginia or Maryland on the Chesapeake. With such
alternatives the Susquehannock's could pick and choose, and bargain for
good prices. They had only to make sure of maintaining their supply of
peltry.
This was not so easy a matter. European demands for skins were great,
and the Indians strove vigorously to meet the demand. In 1626, Isaack de
Rasière reported that Susquehannock's had come to Manhattan to open trade
relations. He also wrote that the Lenape were being harassed by war with
the Susquehannock's, adding significantly that "heretofore we could never
get in touch" with the Susquehannocks.10
His report may be interpreted as meaning that the war antedated trade
competition between Susquehannock's and Lenape, or it may be read to say
that the war began because the Lenape had been blocking Susquehannock
access to the Dutch. What seems likely is that the two Indian peoples
had engaged in occasional smallscale feuds until trade competition
intensified and expanded their conflict. However that may be, the war
was still hotly in progress in 1634 when the Englishman, Thomas Yong,
sailed up the Delaware.11 By 1638, however, when the former Dutch
commander, Peter Minuit, sailed to the site of modern Wilmington to
found New Sweden, the Susquehannock's and the Lenape had come to some
kind of understanding. Chiefs of both peoples came jointly to greet
Minuit.12
|
|
|
|
|
Notes: |
|
9 |
C. A.
Weslager, Dutch Explorers, Traders and Settlers in the Delaware
Valley, 1609-1664 (Philadelphia, 1961), p. 127. |
|
|
|
|
10 |
Isaack de
Rasière to the Amsterdam Chamber of the West India Company, 23
September, 1626, Documents Relating to New Netherland,
1624-1626, in the Henry E. Huntington Library, trans. and ed.,
A. J. F. Van Laer (San Marino, Calif., 1924), pp. 192, 211. |
|
|
|
|
11 |
"Relation of
Captain Thomas Yong, 1634," Narratives of Early Pennsylvania,
West New Jersey, and Delaware, 16301710, ed., Albert Cook Myers
(New York, 1912), pp. 38-42. |
|
|
|
|
12 |
Amandus
Johnson, The Swedish Settlements on the Delaware (2 v.,
Philadelphia, 1911), pp. 182-184; Deposition of Swedish seamen,
1638, Narratives of Early Pennsylvania, pp. 86-89. |
|
|
|
|