|
|
|
Let it be remembered that the Calverts
of Maryland had claimed Delaware Bay while it was in the possession of
the Dutch. After Dutch surrender, Delaware Bay came under the
jurisdiction of New York, and Maryland's claims had to be set aside for
a while. They were not abandoned, however. In 1672 Lord Baltimore
concluded that the time had come to act. He sent a party of thirty
horsemena large troop for the time and placeto plunder the inhabitants
of the Whorekills, a small but strategic community at the mouth of the
bay (Lewes, Delaware).67 New York's bumbling Governor Francis Lovelace
was incredulous and then apoplectic at the news, but Baltimore had timed
the raid with luck.68 England and the Netherlands were at war again;
soon a Dutch fleet returned both New York and the Delaware Bay to Dutch
government, and thus removed Lovelace from any power to chastise
Baltimore. But Baltimore wanted the Whorekills for himself, not for the
Dutch, and in December, 1673, he struck again. He sent forty troopers
this time, under the command of Captain Thomas Howell, who took the
place by a simple show of force. Howell entertained himself by torturing
a merchant into confessing the location of his peltry hoard, and by
committing sundry other "barbarous cruelties." On Christmas Eve he
summoned all the Whorekills inhabitants together, took their arms from
them, and informed them of his instructions from Baltimore to destroy
everything on fifteen minutes' notice" that he must not Leave one stick
standing." His men set fire to the place, standing guard to prevent
anyone from rescuing even a single possession. The bewildered people,
their boats and horses taken away as well as their arms and food, and
with some of their women pregnant, stood aghast. Survivors recalled that
"the Indians that Lived here about wept when they saw the spoil that the
Inhabitants had suffered by their owne native Country men."69 When news
of the attack finally reached Governor General Colve, the new chief of
the revived New Netherland, he ordered immediate "means of support" to
be given to the victims, English as well as Dutch. In his outrage he
further ordered "proper arrangements" to prevent "such cruel tyranny"
thereafter, and he put the inhabitants of Delaware Bay into a state of
military emergency.70
Now it was the turn of the Lord Baltimore's people to feel fear. The
Dutch of Manhattan were far away, and the Dutch of Delaware Bay were
weak; but, given some prodding and arms, the Indian allies of the Dutch
might become terrible indeed, and the Indians were in a highly volatile
state. Continual seizure by Virginians and Marylanders of Indian lands
had led some of the Lenape sachems to contemplate preventive war to hold
their own at Delaware Bay. A couple of Englishmen had been killed by
Indians. Before the Dutch reconquest the English had decided to wage an
Indian war in the spring of 1673, and they had been making plans for it
when the Dutch overthrew their government. One suggestion that had been
made by the Bay Englishmen to their distant Governor in New York is
worth noting. If possible, they had asked, fifty or sixty "North Indyans"
should be hired "who will doe more than 200 men in such a warr." Such
notions would not have escaped the attention of the Marylanders; and
certainly, if the English at the Delaware might have brought in Iroquois
to attack other Indians, there could be small reason to doubt that the
Dutch might bring them in to attack the Marylanders with whom the
Iroquois were already formally at war.71
|
|
|
|
|
Notes: |
|
67 |
Baltimore
erected Worcester County, Md., and put the Whorekills into it by
proclamation, 19 June, 1672. Then he commissioned Thomas Jones
as Captain and Commander in Chief of the new county, with
instructions to suppress all "mutinies, Insurrections, and
Rebellions whatsoever." Jones promptly raided the Whorekills,
taking the opportunity to pick up some plunder for himself and
settle some personal scores. In doing so he became embroiled
with others of Baltimore's men and was hauled into court where
he received punishment for "exceeding his commission." These
complications apparently have obscured the orders that Baltimore
gave per commission in the first place. Whorekills inhabitants'
affidavits, 16 May, 1683, Pennsylvania Mag. of Hist. and Biog.
74 (1950) : p. 477; Elizabeth Merritt, Introduction, Md. Arch. (Provincial
Court) 45: pp. xxiv—xxviii; Session of 11 Dec., 1672, ibid. 45:
pp. 50—55; minutes, 20 April, 1672, Med. Arch. (Council) 5: pp.
106—107; Proclamation of Worcester Co., 19 June, 1672, ibid. 5:
pp. 108109; Commissions, 20 June, 1672, ibid. 5: pp. 109—111. |
|
|
|
|
68 |
See the
documents in Minutes of Exec. Council of N. V. 2: pp. 669—683,
esp. Lovelace to Philip Calvert, 12 Aug., 1672, and Lovelace to
Carr, 7 Oct., 1672, pp. 678—679, 680—682. These letters
establish the fact that James Stuart was informed of the
Marylanders' raid. |
|
|
|
|
69 |
Leon de
Valinger, Jr., "The Burning of the Whorekill, 1673," Pa. Mag. of
Hist. and Biog. 74 (1950): PP. 473—487; Howell's Commission, 1
Oct., 1673, Md. Arch. (Council) 15: pp. 27—29. |
|
|
|
|
70 |
Proclamation,
14 Jan., 1674, N. Y. Go!. Docs. 12: p. 511. |
|
|
|
|
71 |
Tom and
Alrichs to Lovelace, 9 March, 1671; examination of Indians, 6
Oct., 1670; N. Y. Council minutes, 25 Sept., 1671; Delaware
Magistrates to Lovelace [25 Oct.?] 1671, Minutes of Exec.
Council of N. Y. 2: pp. 508, 501, 594, 602—603. |
|
|
|
|