|
|
|
We have to distinguish between the
recorded facts and what the facts would appear to be to the people of
that time. No record shows, and no recorded event suggests, that the
Dutch did actually arm and instigate the Iroquois in this particular
situation. But let us see how it looked to contemporaries. In 1673 there
was an Indian population around the bays that had become embittered
against the English. There was Dutch Governor Colve at Manhattan, under
strong provocation, proclaiming defense measures at Delaware Bay.
Governor Colve was closely allied by treaty to the Iroquois Indians and
presumably could supply them with weapons. The use of Indians for covert
warfare had long been accepted as one of the facts of colonial life, and
Maryland was still in a state of war with the Iroquois. It seems
reasonable to suppose that Lord Baltimore's people began to be nervous
about the Iroquois. A pair of dates are on the record: in January, 1674,
Governor Colve proclaimed his state of emergency; and on the first day
of June, 1674, the Maryland Assembly voted unanimously that it was "necessarie
that a Peace be Concluded" with the Iroquois.72
Having made that decision, the Assembly had to face up to its
implications. Rather, the Lower House of the Assembly had to be
manipulated by the Upper House to accept the implications. Maryland's
executive branch of government consisted of a Governor and Council. In
the legislative process, the executive Council's members sat as an Upper
House to dominate the elective Lower House. Thus the Upper House was
always privy to executive plans and decisions which were disclosed to
the Lower House at discretion and with something less than total candor.
Thus, when the Lower House had safely voted to seek peace with the
Iroquois, the Upper House released some previously undisclosed
information. Its process of disclosure was to initiate sequel
legislation to empower the Governor and Council to make and finance war
even outside the provincial boundaries "forasmuch as that Peace [with
the Iroquois] may bring a Warre with the Sasquahannoughs."73
This was a jolt. Two weeks dragged on while the Lower House withheld its
consent. Final agreement, when it came, included reference to "credible
Informations of the many murthers and Outrages committed upon the
persons and Estates of divers of the good People of this Province in
Baltemore County by the Susquehanna Indians and other their Confederate
Indians by them countenanced and protected contrary to the Articles of
Peace." No bill of particulars accompanied the accusation. Curiously the
charge was advanced not so much to justify punishing the Susquehannock's
as to justify making peace with the Iroquois. It was worded neatly for
Baltimore's maximum advantage in defense or offense, for its mention of
the Susquehannock's' "Confederate Indians" meant the Lenape, and an
expedition against the Lenape would be a march on Delaware Bay. Having
made its findings so conveniently, the Assembly voted a supply for the
expenses of either peace or war .74
|
|
|
|
|
Notes: |
|
72 |
N. V. Col.
Docs. 12: p. 511; Md. Arch. (Upper House) 2: p. 377. |
|
|
|
|
73 |
Minutes, 1 June, 1674, Md. Arch. (Upper
House) 2: p. 378. |
|
|
|
|
74 |
Act
of 16 June, 1674, Md. Arch. 2: pp. 462—463. This document, like
many others missing from Maryland's own collection of manuscript
sources, has been printed from the copy in the English Public
Record Office. Similar papers hereinafter cited as Md. Arch.
(PRO). |
|
|
|
|