|
|
|
On the other side, Andros seems to have
gotten wind somehow of the peculiar activities of his deputy on the
Delaware. With his usual decisiveness, he dismissed Cantwell from office
and commissioned Captain John Collier as replacement. To Collier, Andros
gave fresh instructions. A polite but genuine ultimatum was to be
delivered to Maryland. Either the Susquehannock's were to be actually
received within that province or some acceptable reason for keeping them
dangling in an unconfirmed truce would have to be given to Andros.
Otherwise, Andros would take the Indians himself "rather than hazard
their being obliged to refuge with a grudge and rancour in their hearts,
further off, if not wholly out of our reach." Collier was instructed
further to take another, somewhat ambiguous, message to the
Susquehannock's. As many of those people as could be persuaded were to
be brought to New York. The rest were to be given a new and ominous
warning that "though they shall receive no harme from the Government"
Andros would not "now undertake to Secure them from others where they
are."94
Andros now wrote directly to the deputy governor of Maryland. "I have
some interest with the Mohawks and Senecas," he stated, "which can best
deale with them." At such points the twentieth century despairs of the
seventeenth's bad habit of using pronouns without definite referents.
Who were the "them" who could be dealt with? Did he mean that his
interest could deal with Mo. hawks and Senecas? Or did he mean that the
Mohawks and Senecas could best deal with the Susquehannock's? At least,
Andros was definite, if not entirely clear, on one point. "I shall be
ready to use all fitting means for the best," he wrote; it might have
been either a promise or a threat. So far as the Iroquois were
concerned, Andros expressed a fear that the Susquehannock's might soon
"necessarily Submitt to the Mohawks and Senecas, which passionately
desire it." Such a submission, he thought, might prove "of a bad
consequence." He appears to mean that the consequences would be bad for
Maryland. He pushed the Marylanders to reply. Was the "late Peace" with
the Susquehannock's "Sufficient"? Should the Susquehannock's be
permitted to remain where they were, or should they be removed?95
|
|
|
|
|
Notes: |
|
94 |
Commission
and instructions to Capt. Collyer, 23 Sept., 1676, N. Y. Col.
Docs. 12: pp. 556—557 |
|
|
|
|
95 |
Andros
to Deputy Gov. of Md., 23 Sept., 1675, N. Y. Col. Docs. 12: p.
558. |
|