|
|
|
As though there were not already enough
political complications in the former New Netherland, the royal Stuart
brothers now made more. James, the Duke, sold off the jerseys. Charles,
the King, granted away (to discharge a formidable debt) a province
called Pennsylvania. As regarded Pennsylvania, certain difficulties were
correctly anticipated. Lord Baltimore at once protested that the lord of
Pennsylvania was seizing some lands that by right belonged to the lord
of Maryland. Baltimore neither surprised nor impressed anybody; his
claiming propensities were already well known to the Stuarts. The only
thing new in the conflict of claims was William Penn's offer to
negotiate some sort of compromise. The Dutch had stuck to their claims
and gone down. The Duke of York, through Andros, had maintained his
claims with notable success. Penn, like the thorough Quaker he was,
offered to talk things over. He very rapidly learned what he was up
against.
The heart of Penn's problem was his need for a porta good portfor his
new feudal domain. Stuart generosity had had its limits; Penn's grant
did not include the revenueproducing settlements on the Delaware Bay. He
would not be able to take over a functioning port, but would have to
populate and finance his own. While in England, Penn had planned for two
ports, one on the Delaware River and a second on Chesapeake Bay. He had
thought that his chartered boundaries included the head of the
Chesapeake. He was seriously disturbed when personal reconnaissance, as
well as Baltimore's protests, raised serious questions about where
Pennsylvania's line would fall. A port could not be located higher on
the Susquehanna River because the river's rocks and shallows made it
unnavigable. One thing was certain: without free access to the sea,
Penn's millions of acres of potential profit would be so many empty
dreams, and his planned port on the Delaware would be always dependent
on the good will of the governments controlling Delaware Bay. Penn tried
without success to negotiate with Baltimore for possible purchase of the
head of the Chesapeake.124
|
|
|
|
|
Notes: |
|
124 |
Baltimore to
Wm. Blathwait, 11 March, 1682, Md. Arch. (PRO) 5: p. 349;
Baltimore's account of a private conference with Penn, 29 May,
1683, ibid. 5: pp. 399—400. |
|